Skip to content

Denial management

Denial Management, and Denial Prevention

We focus not only on resolving denials, but also on identifying recurring denial patterns and supporting corrective actions to reduce preventable revenue leakage. A denial worked and closed is one claim. A denial category traced back to the step that caused it is every claim after it.

Two people at adjacent workstations, wearing headsets, working through queues on screen.

What we handle

The resolution work and the prevention work, run together, because separating them is what lets the same denial come back.

Request an RCM Assessment
  • Denial identification from remittance and correspondence

    Denials are picked up from remittances and payer letters as they post, rather than discovered later from an aging report once the appeal window has already moved.

  • Denial categorization against reason and remark codes

    Each denial is grouped against its reason and remark code and against your own categories, so the data is comparable across payers instead of being a list of one-offs.

  • Root-cause analysis by category, payer and originating step

    Denials are traced back to the step that produced them — registration, eligibility, authorization, charge entry or submission — because a denial recorded without a cause is one that will arrive again.

  • Documentation review before rework

    The claim, the remittance and the supporting documentation are read before anything is changed, so the rework answers the stated reason rather than guessing at it.

  • Corrective action at the point in the cycle that caused it

    The fix is made where the problem started, not only on the claim in hand. Correcting the claim alone closes one denial and leaves the process that produced it exactly as it was.

  • Claim correction

    The claim itself is corrected against the reason given, with the change documented on the account so the next person can see what was altered and why.

  • Reconsideration support

    Where a payer offers reconsideration before a formal appeal, the request is prepared and submitted against their stated process and within their stated timeframe.

  • Appeal preparation support

    Appeal packets are assembled from the documentation you provide, against the payer's stated requirements. The clinical narrative and the decision to appeal remain with your team.

  • Appeal deadline tracking

    Each payer's appeal window is tracked against the denial, so an appealable denial does not quietly expire while it sits in a queue behind something larger.

  • Resubmission

    Corrected claims and appeals go back inside the filing deadline, with the submission recorded, so the same claim is not sent twice or assumed sent once.

  • Denial trend reporting

    Denials are reported by reason, by payer and by originating step on the agreed cadence, so what you read is the pattern rather than the individual claim.

  • Preventive action recommendations

    Where a category recurs, the specific upstream change that would address it is written down and put in front of you. Whether to make the change is your decision.

  • Write-off recommendation where the denial is not recoverable

    Where a denial is past appeal, non-covered, or costs more to pursue than it returns, it is recommended for write-off against your policy rather than worked indefinitely.

  • Feedback into registration, eligibility and charge entry

    The recurring categories go back to the steps that create them as a specific change to make. This is the part of denial management that addresses cause rather than symptom.

An open-plan delivery floor: rows of height-adjustable desks, each with a monitor, between low acoustic screens.

Your queues, your system, the same people on them every day.

How a denial is closed

The loop closes at prevent, not at resubmit. A denial that is only resubmitted has taught nobody anything.

  1. Identify

    Denials are picked up from remittances and payer correspondence as they post, rather than discovered later from an aging report when the filing window has already moved.

  2. Categorize

    Each denial is grouped against its reason and remark code and against your own categories, so the data is comparable across payers instead of being a list of one-offs.

  3. Analyze

    The originating step is identified: registration, eligibility, authorization, charge entry or submission. A denial recorded without a cause attached is one that will arrive again.

  4. Correct

    The correction is made at the point that caused it and not only on the claim in front of us, with the documentation supporting it reviewed before anything is sent back.

  5. Resubmit

    The corrected claim, reconsideration or appeal goes back against the payer's stated requirements and inside its filing deadline, with the submission recorded on the account.

  6. Report

    Denials are reported by reason, by payer and by originating step on the agreed cadence, so what is visible is the trend rather than the individual claim.

  7. Prevent

    The recurring categories go back to the step that creates them as a specific change to make. Identifying it is ours; whether to act on it is yours.

  8. Five colleagues around a desk, reading through printed documents and folders together.

What you get

Every denial coded to a category and a cause
Not just the payer's reason code. Where in your cycle it originated, so the fix has somewhere to go.
Corrective actions routed upstream
A registration-caused denial becomes a registration change. We raise it with the evidence rather than reworking it forever.
Appeal preparation, with the deadline tracked
Documentation assembled to your template and the filing window tracked, so an appeal is never lost to a date.
A trend report you can act on
Categories ranked by volume and by value, with what changed since last month and what we recommend doing about it.

Reporting cadence

Daily
Denials identified, categorized and worked.
Weekly
Emerging categories, payer behaviour changes and appeal deadlines approaching.
Monthly
Denial trends by category, payer and cause, with corrective actions taken and recommended.

How it is measured

KPIs and SLAs are customized according to the client's process requirements and contractual scope.

These are the measures we report on. The targets against them belong in your agreement, where they can be negotiated and enforced, rather than on a web page where they cannot.

  • Denial resolution turnaround
  • Denial categorization accuracy
  • Recurrence rate by category
  • Overturn rate on appeals and reconsiderations
  • Appeal deadline compliance
  • Preventable denial volume over time
  • Corrective actions raised and adopted
  • Process compliance against the SOP
  • SLA compliance

Work the denial once

Send us your top denial categories by volume and by value. We will come back with a resolution model, a prevention plan and a transition plan.